Register NOW for All Spring & Summer Programs
Register NOW for All Spring & Summer Programs

There is a popular belief that “everyone has their own natural running gait and it should not be altered”. I have never seen any evidence to back up this theory, I agree that no two people will run exactly the same however there are fundamental movement mechanics that maximize speed, economy and reduce injury risk.
I have worked with, mentored under or taken courses from half a dozen high performance run coaches, I have read countless sport science journals, and the evidence is clear that there are basic principals that consistently maximize speed, economy and injury prevention.
Walk vs Run: A Short Gait Analysis
At first glance, walking and running appear to differ only in speed. In reality, they are fundamentally different movement patterns that rely on very different muscular strategies.
Walking is driven primarily by the anterior chain, particularly the quadriceps, and is characterized by longer ground contact time and a relatively straight-leg gait. Running, on the other hand, relies far more on the posterior chain—glutes, hamstrings, and calves—working in concert with the anterior muscles to generate elasticity which is where power is created.
Running is not just walking faster. It is an elastic bounce and release system.
It comes back to a principle I’ve referenced before:
“The angle of a lever dictates muscle function.”
Change joint position and you change which muscles work and efficiently.
Triple Flexion: The Foundation of Running Power
Good running form is the result of three levers working together—hip, knee, and ankle creating what is known as triple flexion. Triple Flexion is defined as the simultaneous bending of all three joints and this system will determine.
When triple flexion works, force is stored and returned, when it collapse, force is absorbed and lost.
The Ankle
As the big toe pushes off the ground and the leg passes underneath the hip, the ankle should be in a dorsiflexed position (toes pulled up toward the shin).
This serves two critical purposes:
Coaching Cues
The Knee
A sprinters thigh will be close to perpendicular to the ground; for distance runners this would be excessive, but insufficient knee drive limits force production, reduces economy and can be the cause of a number of injuries
A more acute knee angle positions the hip to engage the posterior chain which:
If the knee doesn’t drive forward, maximum force cannot be produced.
Coaching Analogy
One of the ways I try to describe the movement is to have the athlete visualize being on a skate board. In order to propel yourself forward would the propulsion foot hit the ground inline with the foot on the skateboard and push back, or would you drive your knee up and forward in-front of you and pull back ward hitting the ground just in front of your centre mass?
Effective running is achieved by choice number two.
Coaching Cues
The Hips
Hip function is often the most overlooked aspect of running mechanics, foot strike, forward lean, arm drive all important and popular topics, but hip function has a tremendous influence on run performance.
Just like in swimming and in cycling, in running your body goes where your hips lead.
Pelvic Stability
Watch the athlete from behind, does the hip drop to the right when the right foot hits the ground? Does the same happen on the left? Excessive side-to-side hip drop indicates that the triple flexion chain is collapsing on contact. Instead of storing and returning energy, the athlete is absorbing it this leads to:
The Ball Analogy
One of the ways I try to show this visually is to take a tennis ball and a golf ball. Hold each at shoulder height and just drop them on the ground.
Most people expect the tennis ball to bounce higher. In reality, the golf ball does because it is stiff and tightly wound. The tennis ball compresses, losing energy before rebounding.
A collapsing hip behaves like the tennis ball. A stable pelvis behaves like the golf ball energy goes back up, not into the ground.
Pelvic Position: Anterior vs Posterior Tilt
The pelvis transfers force between the upper and lower body and works best when it is level and stacked.
Both restrict hip extension, forcing the hip flexors to work harder during recovery and reducing efficiency. Optimal alignment places the pelvis in a neutral position.
Importance of Posture
As the foot first makes contact with the ground, you should be able to draw a straight line from ankle → hip → shoulder → ear. As the foot leaves the ground, and the big toe is pushing off the same alignment should remain, with a slight forward lean from the ankles to the ear the athlete should not be leaning from the hips or waist
Running efficiency is not about isolated cues or single joints. It emerges when the ankle, knee, and hip function together, maintaining stiffness where needed and elasticity where possible. When triple flexion is coordinated and the pelvis remains stable, power is conserved, contact time is minimized, and speed becomes easier.
Injury Prevention and Triple Flexion
Efficient running mechanics are not just about speed it is also the primary injury prevention strategy. When the hip, knee and ankle function as an integrated system, load is distributed across multiple tissues and stored elastically. When that system breaks down, stress increases, fatigue accelerates, and injury risk increases.
Where Injuries Begin
Most running injuries are not caused by too much force, but by force being absorbed in the wrong place for too long. The result of a lever at the wrong positioning is increased GCT and loss of elastic energy and running goes from popping off the ground and energy release system into a land and push system.
Injury Prevention the Ankle: Achilles, Calf, and Foot Load
When the foot hits the ground in a dorasiflex position the result is:
What happens when this breaks down
Common Injuries
The Knee: Load Distribution and Braking
When, forward and up knee drive diminishes, stride length is often maintained by reaching forward this increases joint stress without increasing speed.
What we should be looking for:
What happens when it breaks down.
Common Injuries
The Hip: The Gatekeeper of Injury Risk
The hip is where most running injuries start, even if symptoms show up elsewhere. As glute endurance fades, the pelvis loses stability. Pace is compromised even though effort increases.
What we should be looking for:
What happens when it breaks down
Common injuries
The Last word on Pelvic Tilt
Both anterior and posterior pelvic tilt restrict hip extension. This causes hip flexors to work harder during recovery. Many “tight hip flexors” may not be “short” they might be overworked due to poor pelvic position.
Thanks for reading

It wasn’t until 2011, after seeing a presentation by Iñigo Mujika at an Own the Podium workshop, that I began to truly understand tapering and its importance to an overall program.
Up until that point, I thought tapering was simple: reduce load for 10–14 days and arrive fresh on race day.
Inigo Mujika is a sport physiologist, coach, and one of the leading researchers in tapering and peaking and that presentation challenged how I thought about tapering. His work made it clear that tapering wasn’t just about doing less. It was about not only how and when to taper but also you should consider what type of taper suited what type of athlete.
In 2015, I took a group of athletes to Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, for a six-week camp. At the time, Triathlon Canada’s national program was led by Jamie Turner, Jamie had established a training base there and spent much of the WTCS season in the region.
Most days after training, I’d meet with Jamie to debrief the day, and this was when I met Inigo who was not only our main point of contact for training in Vitoria he was also a friend of Jamie’s.
It was during those conversations that I realized:
I didn’t know what I didn’t know.
I understood tapering in principle, but I hadn’t considered how different tapering strategies should match an athlete’s profile, training history, or race demands. I had more information on tapering strategies, but not the knowledge on how to integrate it to maximum effect.
When I was asked a few questions and I reflected honestly on my own processes, the answers weren’t great:
Not exactly high-performance thinking.
Tapering Is Not an Add-On
It seemed like an obvious concept, once it had been explained:
The taper is not an add-on to a program—it is the final phase of the most important training block.
Inigo Mujika writes in one of books Tapering and Peaking for Optimal Performance:
“The performance enhancement that usually takes place with the taper is related to recovery of the physiological capacities that were impaired by past training and to restoration of the tolerance to training, resulting in further adaptations during the taper.”
Put more simply, the objectives of an effective taper are to:
Through these conversations, there were a number of takeaways, things I could build on and things I could start to implement and then refine.
Here are a few of the lessons I had learned then, and since.
There Is No One-Size-Fits-All Taper
There are different tapering strategies because there are different types of athletes.
Different race distances and formats also place different demands on the athlete. Understanding what a taper is to accomplish is really about understanding, who the athlete is and how they respond to different types of training and the type of race.
Common Tapering Strategies
Linear Taper
In my experience I have found this taper is most useful for athletes new to the sport or athletes that may be new to your program. It is simple and straight forward, allows coaches to establish some baseline responses and is simple to execute.
Exponential Taper
One of the benefits an Exponential taper has over a Liner taper in my experience is that accumulated fatigue from normal training loads is shed quicker but fitness is preserved. The quicker large drop in volume also allows for some fine tuning as you approach race day.
In my experience this type of taper works best for athletes who respond to lower volumes of normal training, athletes who need to feel really fresh, and athletes who may want to adjust training up or down to feel confident close to race day.
Step Taper
I have found that this approach is good for athletes who may respond a bit slower to added volume in normal training and / or athletes who have recently returned to normal training from illness or injury or where a fast unloading may be needed.
Double Taper (Two-Peak Taper)
This approach is based on the Supercompensation principal, the body overcompensates from the first taper triggering adaptation above the previous fitness level before the final loading / unloading cycle. This strategy is best for athletes who respond quickly to training and / or athletes who lose confidence when training loads are reduced for longer periods.
Full transparency I have only used this tapering strategy once, going into our National Championships last Sept. The athlete had raced only a couple of times over the previous 3-4 years (combination of COVID, illness and rehab from surgery).
1st taper was 2 weeks
1 week unload
2 weeks at 70% load of taper 1
Was it perfect? Hard to say.
But he finished third in U23 so I am confident we are at least moving in the right direction.
My Coaching Takeaways
A few other nuggets that I came away with:
Coaching Checklist: Did the taper work?
The biggest change in my thinking was that tapering was not just something you did going into a race
Thanks for reading

Success in any endurance sport requires a balance of speed, strength, and economy.
As Dr. Jack Daniels famously stated, “The efficient use of energy produces the best performances in any endurance event” (Daniels, 1985).
Decades of research in addition to most coach’s real-world observation consistently show that the athlete with the highest VO2max does not necessarily win. At competitive levels, it is more often the athlete with the greatest economy or efficiency of movement who performs best.
Energy for movement is supplied by three systems:
· ATP-CP (Phosphagen): under 10 seconds
· Anaerobic Glycolysis: up to under 60 seconds
· Aerobic System: over 60sec
All three systems work simultaneously, the intensity and duration of the activity determine their relative energy system contribution, for example energy system contribution for the following events would breakdown something like this
a 1500 m run is 75–85% aerobic / 15–25% anaerobic
a 5 km run is 90–95% aerobic / 5–10% anaerobic
a 10 km run: ~98–99% aerobic / 1–2% anaerobic
How these systems are trained and where performance ceilings are defined has a major impact on economy and therefore performance. High Performance coaches and athletes understand that at the top levels of any endurance sport it is not just about fitness, often the best performances are achieved by athletes with the most efficient movement mechanics (economy).
Terms such as efficiency, energy cost, oxygen cost, and aerobic demand all describe the same concept.
“Economy is the measure of the combined functions of the metabolic, cardiopulmonary, bio-mechanical, and neuro-muscular systems, expressed as oxygen cost at a given workload.”
— Saunders et al., 2004
Simply put this means: how much energy does it cost to move at a given speed or power output?
A study of elite cyclists showed that “gross efficiency” (the ratio of power output to energy input) was a key determinant of cycling performance (Lucia 2002). The study showed that at competitive levels a high level of efficiency can make up for a lower VO2 max.
Conley and Krahenbuhl (1980) showed that running economy is a good predictor to race performance. In a group of highly trained runners a variation of 65% in positive race performance was explained by better run economy. The more economical the runner, the better they were able to run at lower percentages of VO2 and lower lactate levels at a given speed.
“Enhanced economy of movement (biomechanics) is central to continued improvement in performance of top athletes” (Jones 1998).
Dr. Andrew Jones worked with former Woman’s Marathon World Record holder Paula Radcliffe. During that time Radcliffe’s oxygen cost of running at 16km/hr dropped from 205ml/kg/km to 165ml/kg/km almost a 20% improvement in her run economy during which time she consistently set and broke marathon world records one which lasted for 16 years.
(* you can read more about Dr. .Jones findings in his published paper The Physiology of the World Record holder of the Woman’s Marathon)
Why Economy Matters:
· Cycling: Lucia et al. (2002) showed that gross efficiency (power output relative to energy input) was a key determinant of elite cycling performance. High efficiency often compensated for a lower VO2max.
· Running: Conley & Krahenbuhl (1980) found that up to 65% of performance variation in trained runners was explained by running economy.
· Elite Performance: Jones (1998) demonstrated that continued improvements in biomechanics were central to consistent performance gains at the highest levels of competition.
Economy is not static. It is influenced by a number of factors some within our control and others beyond our control:
Non-controllable factors like heat, altitude and weather can affect overall movement economy.
For triathletes, this is critical. It is important to recognize that energy wasted in one discipline directly impacts performance in the next. Improving movement mechanics can deliver performance gains equal to or greater than pure physiological training.
· Reducing ground contact time
· Better hip extension, flexion, and stability
· Increased muscle-tendon stiffness
· Improved hip symmetry and mobility
Bio-mechanics is an often overlooked area in many training programs for triathletes, while swimming is often looked upon as highly technical and most coaches / athletes work on swim technique, that same mindset is often not transferred to cycling and running where physiological fitness is often seen as the most critical factor.
Research consistently shows that in highly trained athletes with similar physiological capacity, technical proficiency equals better performance.
Technically sound athletes:
· Convert fitness into forward motion more effectively
· Produce greater force at lower energy cost
· Sustain higher outputs at lower VO2 and lactate levels
Cycling Economy: Often the Hidden Limiter
Cycling economy may be as important as run economy for most triathletes. Regardless the distance of event you will spend half your race on your bike and wasted energy there negatively impacts run performance. Introducing some strength training and a focus on improving movement patterns results in improved performance.
Key performance contributors include:
· Strength and resistance training
· Pedal mechanics and force application
· Stable hips and upper body
· Proper bike fit
· Balance and control at race speeds
Better economy of movement = lower energy cost = better performance. For most athletes improving movement mechanics will result in improved performances without increased work loads, reducing injury potential and recovery time.
· At elite levels, bio-mechanics and economy separate performances
· Economy is trainable through strength, skill, and movement quality
· Technical improvements can unlock performance without increasing training load
· Strength training and drills that improve movement patterns benefit all three disciplines
And ultimately, that’s what we’re all training for.

When I started out coaching I didn’t know a lot about the proper bio-mechanics for each sport, it took 8 words after a race to change that. It was 2007 and Matt Vierula (the only junior athlete in the club) finished third at the Junior Provincial Draft Legal Championships, in our chat after he said to me “next year I want to do even better” that was when I realized that I needed to be able to teach, to improve not just the athletes fitness but every aspect of the sport. Since then I have spent countless hours learning the intricacies of bio-mechanics, whether it was working with more experienced coaches, reading books and sport science journals or just watching really good athletes perform. I really felt in order to provide the athletes with the best chance of success I needed to understand the nuances of movement efficiency and economy, this has been a cornerstone of my programming since.
When we discuss technique we often talk about what we see. Body position, sequencing, posture or if the movement matches what we want. But are you taking into consideration all the factors that may dictate the athletes capacity at that time? Their physical capacities, cognitive understanding, even the environment(s) that impact movement quality?
As coaches we tend to think that movement quality is largely based on what we say, the cues we give or what drills we introduce into our program, the truth is our instruction may have less impact on an athlete’s movements than we would like to think.
Constraints and Movement
Newell’s Theory of Constraints (1985) – states, human movement is a framework in motor development and learning that suggests movement is the interaction of three, overlapping, types of constraints:
Individual Constraints- the athlete – height, weight, strength, injury history, coordination, mobility, cognitive capacity
Environmental Constraints - weather, playing surface, temperature, terrain, visibility
Task Constraints - sport specific, rules, equipment, objectives and task comprehension
Coaching interventions most often target the TASK constraint, focusing on what an athlete should be doing or what the movement should “look like” while this is important and has some influence it is only addressing one part of the overall system
This Highlights a Critical Coaching Question
“At this point is the athlete capable of performing the movement being asked for under the conditions required?”.
Angles, Levers and Muscle Function
A very useful guiding concept of movement mechanics to be understood is:
“The angle of a lever dictates muscle function”
Joint angles will always determine which muscles can contribute effectively to a movement
By observing joint angles and viewing movement as an interaction of what comes before and after (fluidity) rather than separate actions, coaches may better identify any underlying constraints and then choose the more appropriate intervention.
For example; In my experience many swimmers coming into triathlon, lack sufficient hip mobility (extension, flexion and control) to achieve effective hip angles for running. This doesn’t mean the athlete can’t run, however this mobility constraint will limit long term run performance, so addressing mobility and strength constraints before increasing run volume may be a more effective long term strategy. Running on its own, probably wont address the athletes constraint.
Training Skill Development and Coaching
World class performances are based around effective movement patterns. Movement is the combination of both physiological and neurological functions, beliefs about what we think a skill is shapes every coaching decision we make including what drills we introduce, what feedback we give and what assumptions we make. If you think movement patterns are not skills, you are likely not going to pay much attention to the athlete’s movements. I think it is worth asking yourself some reflective questions when working on technical adaptations.
Improving technique is less about providing the perfect instruction and more about understanding the athlete’s constraints, respecting and working within their capacity and guiding their adaptation. The challenge is not to abandon your current systems and practices but to objectively evaluate if your approach is teaching the skills needed to meet the demands at the top end of the sport in a competitive environment. Ultimately skill acquisition is not what an athlete can do in training, it is what they can do under fatigue and under the pressure of competition.
Thanks For Reading.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.